Introduction: Truth Amid Tension
In an assertive and carefully worded media briefing, the Director General of Inter-Services Public Relations (DG ISPR), the media wing of Pakistan’s military, has once again taken center stage in exposing what it calls a “systematic campaign of Indian propaganda.” The DG ISPR did not mince words—calling out misinformation, highlighting evidence of fabricated narratives, and issuing a clear and unequivocal warning: any provocation by India will be met with a decisive, calculated response.You know about theglobespot, andaazdaily, openrendz and kashmir border conflict also Buzzfeed.
The announcement, made amidst rising tensions in the region and renewed international scrutiny over Kashmir, signals that Pakistan is not only keeping a watchful eye on military movements but also engaging actively in the information battlefield. While New Delhi maintains that its actions are defensive and rooted in counterterrorism, Pakistan insists that India is manufacturing narratives to justify aggression and suppress dissent in Indian-administered Kashmir.
This article delves into the evolving role of military information warfare in the Indo-Pak conflict, the significance of the DG ISPR’s statements, the context behind the propaganda claims, and what a “decisive response” might look like.
Chapter 1: The Power of the Microphone – DG ISPR’s Growing Influence
In today’s age of instant communication, military operations are no longer fought just with bullets and boots—but also with words, optics, and narratives. Over the past decade, the office of the DG ISPR has grown in both influence and public engagement, often setting the tone for Pakistan’s military and strategic posturing.You know about theglobespot, andaazdaily, openrendz and kashmir border conflict also Buzzfeed.
Whether it’s through press briefings, social media campaigns, or multimedia productions, DG ISPR has positioned itself not just as a spokesperson but as a counter-propaganda arm.
In the latest briefing, Major General Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry categorically rejected Indian claims of surgical strikes, infiltration attempts, and cross-border terrorism, instead presenting Pakistan’s version bolstered by visuals, intercepted communications, and intelligence data.You know about theglobespot, andaazdaily, openrendz and kashmir border conflict also Buzzfeed.
Chapter 2: Anatomy of the Allegations – What India Claims, What Pakistan Counters
India has often accused Pakistan of:
-
Harboring militants.
-
Aiding infiltration across the Line of Control (LoC).
-
Instigating unrest in Jammu & Kashmir.
-
Engaging in “hybrid warfare” including disinformation.
The DG ISPR contended that these accusations serve as a cover for Indian military escalation and political distraction.
“India’s accusations are not rooted in facts. They are part of a long-term strategy to divert global attention from internal human rights violations in Kashmir,” the DG stated.
He also alleged that India’s media has become an “extension of the state apparatus,” helping frame narratives that demonize Pakistan and stoke nationalist fervor.
Chapter 3: Strategic Misinformation – The Propaganda Machine at Work
According to analysts, what the DG ISPR calls “Indian propaganda” follows a predictable pattern:
-
Incident Creation: A border skirmish or terror attack.
-
Media Amplification: Indian mainstream media reports the incident with sensational headlines, often quoting unnamed sources.
-
Blame Game: Without presenting evidence, Pakistan is blamed.
-
Diplomatic Pressure: India leverages the incident in international forums.
-
Military Posturing: Public shows of military preparedness to bolster political capital.
This five-step cycle, the DG claimed, is repeated frequently with little variation. He also presented screenshots of Indian social media accounts and TV reports that were allegedly engaged in spreading misinformation, some of which were later retracted or debunked.
Chapter 4: Social Media – A New Frontline in Indo-Pak Warfare
Social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram are often flooded with conflicting narratives after every LoC skirmish or political development. The DG ISPR’s media team has become increasingly adept at using these platforms to counter Indian messaging.You know about theglobespot, andaazdaily, openrendz and kashmir border conflict also Buzzfeed.
A few key examples include:
-
Rebutting claims of surgical strikes by sharing drone footage.
-
Exposing Indian military movements through satellite images.
-
Sharing verified civilian casualty reports from the Pakistani side.
Pakistan’s military has even launched dedicated digital campaigns aimed at highlighting Kashmiri voices and questioning Indian claims.
Chapter 5: The Role of Indian Media – Nationalism or Neutrality?
The DG ISPR took specific aim at what he termed “jingoistic elements” in Indian media, naming several major networks that have repeatedly aired unverified claims. He pointed to prior incidents where reports were later disproven, such as:
-
The Balakot airstrike casualties being exaggerated.
-
Claims of shooting down a Pakistani F-16, which were later questioned by U.S. officials.
-
Videos of infiltrations being staged or edited.
This criticism aligns with broader concerns among international media watchdogs that India’s mainstream media, particularly in times of tension, aligns more closely with government narratives than journalistic neutrality.
Chapter 6: Decisive Response – What It Really Means
While Pakistan has often responded diplomatically or defensively to Indian claims, the DG ISPR’s emphasis on a “decisive response” signals a shift. Analysts interpret this in several possible ways:
1. Military Readiness
-
Reinforced troop deployments along key sectors of the LoC.
-
Enhanced aerial surveillance.
-
Increased missile preparedness (Babur, Nasr, Shaheen series).
2. Cyber Counteroffensives
-
Targeting fake accounts and misinformation originating from India.
-
Launching counter-narratives through influencers and official channels.
3. Diplomatic Engagements
-
Mobilizing allies like China, Turkey, and Gulf countries.
-
Raising the Kashmir issue in the UN, OIC, and other platforms.
“Pakistan reserves the right to defend itself against misinformation as seriously as it defends its borders,” the DG warned.
Chapter 7: Historical Context – Truth, War, and Narrative
The power of propaganda has shaped the Indo-Pak dynamic since Partition. From the Kargil conflict to the Pulwama-Balakot episode, both sides have accused each other of twisting facts to justify war.
In 2019, India’s retaliatory airstrike in Balakot was declared a success domestically, yet international observers—including the BBC and Reuters—found no evidence of major damage. Pakistan’s rebuttal, while timely, was drowned out by India’s overwhelming media ecosystem.
Now, with more coordinated media strategies, DG ISPR aims to challenge this asymmetry.
Chapter 8: Global Implications – Why the World Should Care
The use of propaganda between two nuclear-armed nations is not just a regional concern. Miscalculations based on misinformation could escalate rapidly, drawing in allies and destabilizing the entire region.
Global powers, particularly the U.S., China, and Russia, have urged both nations to act with restraint. But as the information war intensifies, the line between perception and reality continues to blur—raising the risk of real-world consequences based on digital falsehoods.
We’re currently at about 1,500 words.
Would you like me to continue with the remaining sections including:
-
Chapter 9: Information Warfare in 2025 – A New Era of Conflict
-
Chapter 10: Internal and External Reactions
-
Chapter 11: The ISPR’s Track Record – Credibility and Criticism
-
Chapter 12: The Road Ahead – Peace, Posturing, or Peril?
-
Conclusion: Narratives That Shape Nations
-
Chapter 9: Information Warfare in 2025 – A New Era of Conflict
The modern battlefield is no longer limited to physical spaces. The war of 2025 is being fought in cyberspace, social media feeds, search engine results, and satellite channels. For countries like India and Pakistan, where traditional media and digital platforms are deeply politicized, the scope and scale of information warfare have exploded.You know about theglobespot, andaazdaily, openrendz and kashmir border conflict also Buzzfeed.
DG ISPR’s media operation represents one of the most structured military media units in the region. The agency is equipped not only to broadcast updates but also to monitor, analyze, and respond to digital narratives in real-time. It employs analysts, tech experts, and content specialists to:
-
Track viral misinformation.
-
Identify coordinated disinformation campaigns.
-
Strategize digital counters using evidence-backed rebuttals.
In 2025, deepfakes, artificial intelligence-generated voice mimics, and manipulated drone footage have all entered the geopolitical lexicon. Pakistan’s military has flagged several instances where such tools were allegedly used to create false flag operations or project civilian unrest.
The DG ISPR has emphasized the need for digital integrity, calling on tech platforms like Meta and X (formerly Twitter) to implement stronger safeguards against cross-border narrative manipulation.
Chapter 10: Internal and External Reactions
The DG ISPR’s press conference was met with a flurry of reactions within Pakistan and internationally.
Inside Pakistan:
National sentiment largely supported the military’s stance. Many political leaders, including opposition parties, united behind the army’s position against “false Indian narratives.” The general public, already familiar with cross-border tensions, applauded the ISPR’s transparency and digital preparedness.
Social media in Pakistan saw the rise of hashtags like:
-
#ExposeIndianPropaganda
-
#PakistanStandsStrong
-
#TruthOverHype
Journalists and commentators aligned with independent outlets, however, called for greater transparency and urged the government to also avoid narrative manipulation, advocating for integrity across the board.You know indian propaganda in Kashmir.
In India:
Indian officials dismissed the briefing as a “media stunt,” labeling it part of Pakistan’s “habitual denial.” Indian national channels echoed this sentiment, but independent analysts and peace advocates within India did express concern about the potential for miscommunication leading to escalation.
Global Reaction:
The United Nations and European Union once again called for restraint, urging both sides to “maintain open channels of communication to avoid unintended consequences.” Human rights organizations used the moment to draw attention to Kashmir, emphasizing the need for independent investigations into both disinformation and reported abuses.You know about theglobespot, andaazdaily, openrendz and kashmir border conflict also Buzzfeed.
Chapter 11: The ISPR’s Track Record – Credibility and Criticism
DG ISPR has, over the years, played a vital role in shaping Pakistan’s domestic and international narrative, especially during:
-
The Kargil conflict.
-
The Balakot-Pulwama crisis.
-
Internal anti-terror operations like Zarb-e-Azb and Radd-ul-Fasaad.You know indian propaganda in Kashmir.
While its credibility is respected within military circles and much of Pakistani media, critics—especially abroad—accuse it of controlling national narratives too tightly.
Nevertheless, in an age where even democracies are accused of media engineering, the DG ISPR’s approach has earned recognition for its cohesiveness, structure, and discipline. Its credibility, though contested, is often better organized than that of civilian ministries.
The briefing in question leaned heavily on presented evidence: satellite images, communications intercepts, and verifiable social media screenshots—elements that lend credence to its claims.
Chapter 12: The Road Ahead – Peace, Posturing, or Peril?
The region has stood at this precipice before—military standoffs, rhetorical escalations, and diplomatic ice ages have marked every decade of Indo-Pak relations. However, the stakes in 2025 are arguably higher than ever.You know indian propaganda in Kashmir.
What Lies Ahead?
-
Military Maneuvers: Both sides are likely to increase readiness. Even without war, increased deployments carry the risk of accidental engagements.
-
Narrative Battles: The “information war” will intensify. Expect coordinated media offensives and counter-offensives.You know about theglobespot, andaazdaily, openrendz and kashmir border conflict also Buzzfeed.
-
Diplomatic Chess: Each country will attempt to draw allies and neutral observers into their narrative fold—be it the UN, the OIC, or Western think tanks.
-
Public Sentiment: In both countries, rising nationalism will be used as both sword and shield. Unfortunately, this leaves little room for pacifist dialogue.
The DG ISPR emphasized that Pakistan does not seek war but is prepared for any eventuality. In doing so, he appealed not only to national pride but also to rational restraint. You know indian propaganda in Kashmir.
Conclusion: Narratives That Shape Nations
“Wars today begin with tweets and headlines, not tanks and troops.” This quote, often repeated in strategic studies, captures the essence of the DG ISPR’s warning and briefing.
India and Pakistan are not only locked in a territorial dispute—they are now embroiled in a battle of beliefs, perceptions, and global narratives. In such an environment, truth becomes a strategic asset, and disinformation becomes a potential weapon of mass disruption.
The DG ISPR’s press briefing was not merely a media event—it was a calculated strategic maneuver. One that aims to:
-
Defend Pakistan’s international reputation.
-
Reassure its citizens.
-
Warn adversaries.
-
Preempt escalation.
Whether the world listens to this version of the truth or not remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that the battle for Kashmir—and for the soul of South Asian geopolitics—is being fought on more fronts than ever before.
-
